Again, I am spending time again on thinking about teaching
and preparing students for Question 3 on the new AQA English exam paper. In
fact, I think I have spent so much time on it that I have forgotten to pay
bills, respond to emails and feed my own children. They are looking a bit feral
at the moment. All this for one question. And, it is only worth eight marks.
This week, with a group of Year 9s I looked at Stevie Smith’s
‘Come on, come back’. We have been looking at dystopian fiction and I thought I’d
look at the poem through the GCSE exam question prism. Did I mention poem are
great examples for Paper 1 practice? Anyway, we worked through the questions. Find
five things that show this a dystopian world. How does the writer use language for
effect in this section? How is the text structured?
I have worked with students across KS3 and KS4 to get used
to sketching three key images from a text, when looking at structure. I am,
very simplistically, getting students to see the text in terms of start, middle
and end. Draw the beginning, the middle and the end. In fact, my mantra is always,
when looking at the structure, start, middle and end. What is at the start?
What is in the middle? What is at the end?
Yes, it is simplistic, but it helps students to see three separate
entities. It also helps students to structure their responses. Point one:
beginning. Point two: middle. Point three: end. When students have that clear
view of the text, then we can add additional questions?
When is the setting introduced? When is the character
introduced? Where is the atmosphere created?
These are all important questions when looking at the structure
of the text. Why reveal the character at the start, middle or end?
A character introduced
in the start might suggest the story is focused on this one character.
A character introduced
in the opening might show that the story is focused on feelings / emotions and
the journey this character experiences.
A character
introduced at the end of an extract might be because the writer wants to build
up to the character.
They are choices. Why did the writer put that character
there? I recently used an extract from ‘Great Gatsby’ and it was interesting
for the choices about character. The start and the middle were all focused on
Gatsby. The end of the extract referred to the narrator and what was happening
to them. This structural choice reflected the narrator’s obsession with Gatsby.
Three quarters of the text was dedicated to this one character. Then, when you explore
the structure further, you see that the character of Gatsby is introduced, but
only through his house and the activity in the house. Seeing the extract from a
character perspective, helps us see the way the text is structured. A reliance
on feature spotting undermines the overall structure of a text.
If we look at ‘Come on, come back’, the structure is
interesting. The start – a girl is introduced. The middle – the girl drowns.
The end – a sentinel calls out to her. We see that the focus is on the
character from the start. She introduced to us at the start. Yet, the character
is killed off in the middle. It is like ‘Game of Thrones’. Storytelling tends
to have death at the end or start of writing, because it tends to be strong way
to start and end things. Nothing is more finite. Yet, the writer (poet) has the
character introduced at the start and killed in the middle. That means her
death has some significance. The aftermath of her death has some meaning so the
writer has continued the story after her death. It could be to be poignant.
Here is a lonely girl and at the end she isn’t alone, but it is too late. Or,
it could be about desire escape the events of the conflict and that her only
way to escape is death. The sentinel at the end is a reminder she cannot
escape.
Looking at the poem you see that the setting is continually
referred to throughout, but, in my personal opinion, it is more noticeable at
the point of drowning, which could show us how the landscaping is consuming
her. We could even say there is a sense of repetition with the start. The water
consumes her as did the world she escaped from.
Of course, you can start throwing in terminology and refer
to the third person perspective, which add to the sense of distance and
emotional detachment of the character. We are emotionless as too is the ‘girl’.
This detachment is a repeated motif in the poem. All this started with the three words ‘start,
middle and end’. However, we took this a bit further. We tried to summarise the
poem’s structure with three words. One for the start. One for the middle. One
for the ending.
This is what we came up with:
Lost – escape – fail
Scenery – feelings – death
Death – feelings – death
Before – death – after
Inside – outside – inside
Story – feeling – death
Past – present – past
Darkness – light – darkness
Loneliness – escape – company
Information – emotive
The great thing is that with each suggestion students had to
justify their idea with reference to the text. We also looked at the
connections between the words used for the opening – lost, scenery, death,
inside, past, darkness, loneliness. Students were able to confidently talk
about structure and meaning at the same time.
Regular readers of the blog will note similarities with my
ideas about ‘inference words’ and that is on purpose. If a student can sum up a
section of a text, they will be able to effectively comment on the structure of
the text. You can’t teach structure without focusing solely on specific texts.
No two texts are ever going to be alike. Teaching students to spot common
things and techniques is dangerous. That’s why I like this approach of
empowering students to comment on the structural choices themselves. See the
text as three separate components. Then, summarise the different components and
then look at how they are connected together. You can then refer to other technique, but
always have the disclaimer attached to a method or technique: not every writer
uses this approach. In fact, only a few do.
I have found these three words so helpful when exploring
structure. A starting point to engage with the thinking.
All this for eight marks on the exam paper.
Thanks for reading,
Xris
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. With my students it does seem to be the link between structure and meaning that is missing. I shall try this and see how we go! Liv
ReplyDeleteIs it this one? http://learningfrommymistakesenglish.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/vocabulary-knowledge-awakens.html
ReplyDelete