In my time, as a teacher, I have seen numerous lesson plans
for schemes of work on story writing; and, if I am honest, they have bored me.
Creative writing, sometimes, is boiled down to the following structure:
Opening
Complication
Crisis
Resolution
Now, I am not a published author, nor am I a renowned critic,
nor am I an expert on stories, but, this typical structure for stories, we often
teach our students, has no relation to real stories. I think of the last five
books I have read and none of them can be squeezed (with the flabby bits
hanging over the trousers) into this framework. Yet, again and again on TES and
other teacher sites I see this structure enforced on students. It just doesn’t
work for me. I never see myself comment on a student’s resolution and I never criticise
a student’s crisis in their crafted story. In fact, in exam reports I have
never seen the following comment:
‘Students are commonly producing over-the-top complications
and their resolutions never tie up any previous plot threads. Please avoid
sub-plots. There seems to be a growing trend of students ending their stories
with a cliffhanger, which is honestly disappointing for the reader.’
In fact, I find, all too often, that the way we teach
creative writing tends to be from a lobotomy point of view. I, and many others,
have taught schemes of work on the basis that the students in the class haven’t
a clue about how stories work. Remember
to use characters in your story. Don’t
forget to use a setting. It isn’t that important for students to be told
this. I have yet to read a story that has been set in an empty nothing and it
is populated by no characters.
Having children of my own, I see that a lot of what has
happened in the past has been spelling out the basics. My daughters could tell
me, at seven, what a good story needs. In fact, they intuitively know. So when
they tell me a story about Stinky the Mouse and his journey on a boat, they
know what will make the story better. They know if Stinky loses his cheese, the
tension will be raised. They know that Stinky must find his cheese, friends or
home at the end of the story. You can see that, unlike me, my daughters have a
better chance of starting a writing career than me.
I feel partly annoyed with myself that I taught creative
writing in this way. I feel as though I have been teaching in such a basic way.
I can’t take all the responsibility, because the National Curriculum enforced this
structured way of teaching story writing on me, you, us.
This term, I have been working with Year 9s to write
dystopian stories. You’ll be pleased to know that I haven’t even muttered the
words ‘crisis’, ‘complication’ or ‘resolution’. I did use the word ‘opening’
and that’s only because they are writing their opening to their dystopian
story. So, what did I use to help them structure their stories? Motifs.
When reading the opening of ‘Divergent’ I noticed how hair
was mentioned. This hair motif is a constant pattern in the books. In fact, it
is a constant motif used in dystopian fiction. We were able to make connections
with ‘Hunger Games’ and how all the stories featured a scene where a character
has their hair cut or style. Occasionally, this is through their choice or, as
typically, in dystopian worlds the new hairstyle is forced on them. Of course,
the symbolism of the motif is clear, but the message of the motif is far more profound.
Do we fit in? Or, do we rebel?
To get the idea of motifs, I used the short film, Alma. Here
is the link on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tECaYQ1AzkM
We had to watch it twice to get the idea of the window
motif.
The boy looks though a window.
The doll look through the window at the boy.
The boy looks at the glass eyes of the doll.
The boy as a doll looks out of the doll’s glass eyes.
Another child looks through the window.
Clearly, the phases ‘the eyes are a window to the soul’
springs to mind. However, the idea was clear for the students.
We then, as a class, looked at possible motifs we could use
to reflect the idea of a dystopian society:
·
Cracks
·
Shattered glass
Shattered glass
·
Reflections in mirrors
Reflections in mirrors
·
Mistakes
Mistakes
·
Watching
Watching
The class then formed a visual plan around the motif. I
picked up on the ‘crack’ motif. No sniggers, please.
[1] A small crack in a wine glass
[2] A crack in a tile on the floor
[3] Two characters are splitting up – a crack in their relationship
[4] A news report on an earthquake
We were planning visually, creatively and symbolical and
there wasn’t even a ‘crisis’ in sight. I had one lovely example of a student
looking at ‘observer’ motif.
[1] A man watches another person
[2] A CCTV camera
[3] A bird
[4] An object
I noticed when the students started writing that the motifs
told the story for the students. I didn’t need to worry about the overall
structure. As long as they knew that
their motif had to be subtle and they had to avoid the same adjectives and
verbs with each motif, then they would produce some great writing.
I know that if I focused on the opening, complication,
crisis and resolution, I would have a typical Hollywood Summer Blockbuster,
including 20 billion scenes involving CGI explosions and seven two-dimensional
character, written on four sides of A4.
So, when I am going to get students to write a piece of
creative writing now, I am going to ask them one, simple question: What is you
motif?
Thanks for reading,
Xris
P.S. ‘Stinky the Mouse and the hunt for the lost chunk of
cheese’ will be available from all good retailers in December.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.