Wouldn’t it be nice to have a crystal ball?
Wouldn’t it be nice to see whether the education system improves
or not?
Wouldn’t it be nice to see if the workload for teachers
reduces in the future?
Wouldn’t it be nice to see the outcome of the next General
Election now?
A lovely crystal ball would certainly be handy. Then again,
the problem with knowing the future is that it influences some of the choices
leading up to it. You become conscious of the choices you make and the implications
of each choice. Listen to me, I sound like the ardent time traveller. Only,
yesterday, I transported myself back a thousand years and spent a good hour
stomping on butterflies. Nothing happened.
One of the ‘great’ things about some of the recent changes
to the English curriculum is the addition of more Shakespeare in the
curriculum. As a result of this, our Year
8s are now studying Macbeth. Interestingly, a play about predictions and choices.
Oh, and, a whole load of other things.
Now, in the past I have always used prediction in a number
of ‘predictable’ ways.
Based on the title,
what do you predict the play is about?
Look at the names of
the characters. What do you predict the story will be?
Here are some lines from
the play. What is the story?
Let’s watch this scene. What happens next?
Here are some objects.
Predict how they could be used in a story.
In fact, all I have done there is copy and paste from a work
sheet I use – only joking. But, generally, that’s what I tend to do. I might
spice things up and start with some contextual background or some key words,
but the prediction usually centres on the plot.’ Predict the plot’ tends to be
the staple tool of an English teacher. I bet you were naturally predicting the
content of this blog when you first saw the title ‘Predicting – the Macbeth way’.
I am allergic to working through a text in a logical and
chronological way. In the age of spoilers and sneaky boys that read the last
page and tell everyone on the bus, I like to be creative in how we, as a class,
explore a story. Yes, there’s a time and a place for being genuinely surprised
when reading a story, but the hard thing, often for students, is the plot of
Shakespeare’s plays. This week I found a great little script on TES. It’s
called ‘Macbeth for beginners’.
We read the script as a class. Then, I separated the story
into twelve episodes. Students were given the task of scripting a scene in
pairs. The only rules I gave them were:
[1] It must be tense and dramatic through the language choices
and stage directions. Not by adding gore or violence.
[2]It must be close to Shakespeare’s style of writing, using
the kind of imagery and techniques Shakespeare usually employs.
[3] It must be two minutes long.
[4] It must all be written in iambic pentameter. Okay, maybe
not that rule.
They were predicting the dramatic choices rather than the
plot, which in my book is a lot more stretching than: It has witches in it –
what do you think will happen?
For a lesson, the students worked busily on their scripts, making
some interesting choices. I had to snigger with a pair of boys writing the
scene after the murder of King Duncan. The only description for the scene they
had was: Lady Macbeth waits for Macbeth to return from murdering King Duncan.
This is a rough approximation of the conversation I overheard:
Student 1: We can’t have her talking to herself for too
long. What about a noise?
Student 2: Yeah, and she can react to it. What kind of
noise? A bang.
Student 1: Nah, how about a cat?
Student 2: Yeah, a cat.
Student 1: Or, what about an owl?
Student 2: Yeah, an
owl would be better. You would know it was a cat straightaway, but if it was bird,
it might make other noises.
The great thing about this for me was the discussion on
dramatic choices. The students, from the start, were thinking of the play in
terms of dramatic context. What would make things dramatic? What choices are
important for creating tension?
I have always had the frustration of students focusing on
the plot more than the linguistic / dramatic choices, but this approach seemed
to change things for me. Teaching Shakespeare can be endless decoding or translating
for students. This allowed students to engage in the dramatic choices pretty
soon in the reading process.
The next step for me is to get students to write a
commentary on the choices they made as playwrights. Then, as we read through
the play, we can compare the student version with the original Shakespeare
version and compare and contrast them. From the start, the focus is on the
construction of the play, rather than the story.
But what is the implication for other aspects of English?
Take this scenario:
Tell students that they are going to read an article criticising
Jamie Oliver. In the article, the writer cites the following reasons for not
liking him:
[1] He pretends to be like ‘Joe Public’ when he is very
rich.
[2] Has endless supply of famous friends.
[3] Uses ingredients that most of us would never use.
[4] Rarely gives precise ingredients.
The article is humorous. Write one of the paragraphs,
thinking how you could make it humorous.
Then, compare with the original article.
As a teacher, I spend a lot of time analysing extracts. Put a
sheet in a student’s face and then get them to search for things. However, this
predicting the writing hold more weight for me. A lot of activities are based
post reading and this approach allows us to focus on the writing pre-reading.
Predicting how things are written makes things far more interesting than predicting
what is written.
Thanks for reading. I am off to check the tea leaves at the
bottom of my mug. Or, I might go back and squash a few more butterflies.
Xris