I think I can safely say that we are in the Google era.
Everything possible in existence is accessible through a search engine, it
seems. How many times do we say or hear ‘just Google it’? Knowledge is now like
entertainment. It is instantaneous. It has to be quick or people will switch
off. The same applies with learning in lessons. It has to be quick, fast and done
in seconds. Everything seems to be done by focusing on the clocks. The moving
finger of Ofsted and leaders points to pace and making lessons have pace, but I
will always argue that fast learning can be superficial learning. It may look
good in appearance, but it doesn’t do the job. But, sadly, this fast approach
is ingrained in our culture. It is everywhere. I often use Google to find
things and sometimes it can be brilliant and at other times can be useless.
Most teachers have spent time looking for resources on the Internet only to
waste twenty minutes finding everything bar the one thing that they needed in
the first place. Unfortunately, not many students have cottoned on to the fact
that Google and the Internet is just one tool amongst many others. It isn’t the
‘go to’ or the ‘problem solver’ they think it is.
And then there
were none
I have spent hours, day and maybe weeks in libraries as a
student. If I had time, I’d visit university libraries more often, as I find
they have more relevant articles on the texts I teach than four months’ worth
of searches on Google. But, how do we shift this attitude that is prevalent in
society? The sad thing is that some schools have abandoned libraries
completely. Teachers have stood by as a dumb witness to all this craziness. I
know of one school that has replaced a library with another classroom, because
they felt that everything now should be about e-books. Murder of libraries is
easy, as the Government proves. If we
are going to improve the academic quality of teaching, then we need to go to
the churches of academia: the libraries. In truth, I feel that in my school we
had neglected the library. It had become a room for exams or meetings. However,
this week I went a little crazy and I challenged attitudes in the school about
libraries. I made it clear to staff and students that I wanted them to rename
the library. I gave everyone a chance to have their say of which option they
preferred of: Learning Resources Centre
Knowledge Café
Research Hub
Learning Hub
Learning Laboratory
Ye Olde Google
It was as if I was the hound of death and I was personally responsible
for the murder of Roger Ackroyd. I was the evil under the sun for suggesting
such a change. The mirror had crack’d from side to side. Most students preferred the name ‘library’. I
was surprised how conservative our students were with the changes. I had
certainly ruffled a few feathers and put the cat among the pigeons. They were
adamant that it shouldn’t change, but if it doesn’t change, then their
attitudes towards it will not change. Therefore, I am in the process of
rebranding the library. Like the business world, it is about changing behaviour
and attitudes, which will lead to more sales.
As of Tuesday, the library will be called the ‘Learning Resource
Centre’. I am all for students taking ownership of things, but no student
wanted to call it anything but the library, yet most have never used it.
The New Improved
Library
People might read this and think how I might have a lot of
work to do to create a reading culture in our school, but I don’t, because
tirelessly for the past five years I have done the following things with help
from my colleagues:
·
Ran a book club for teachers
·
Advertised to parents teacher’s favourite reads
·
Organised an annual readathon
·
Book talks
·
Carnegie Shadowing Groups
·
World Book Day celebrations
·
Recommended reads
·
Made a video persuading students to read over
the summer holidays
There are many other things that we have done. The emphasis
had been placed through the English Department and not through the library. Each
thing may have got students in the library, but I don’t think they changed their
attitude towards it, or reading. They made the readers read more. But, I don’t
think they always made the non-readers read.
The activities certainly promoted reading, but did they really change
attitudes? Maybe in time, some students will have been persuaded to read, but
it isn’t enough for me. That certainly is one of the Labours of Hercules or one
of the thirteen problems.
The purpose of a library has been lost over time. Ingrained
in the subconscious of most adults is the notion that the library is the source
of lots of information. It has the answers to some of our problems. Students,
however, don’t see that purpose to a library. They see it as a holder of old
books that only boffins read. Therefore, over the next few months, with the
help of the librarian (I mean, Learning Resource Manager – Partners in Crime)
we are going to rebrand the name and the purpose of the library. We hope to put
it at the centre of the learning in our school. We are going to sell our
services to students and staff. There should be a few steps before they type a
few key words into a search engine. One of the first steps should be visiting ‘Ye
Olde Google’.
What can the library offer students?
·
Study guides and textbooks for revision
·
Direction and support with research
·
Example types of writing so they can see other
how others write
·
Support with compiling and presenting work
·
Printing
·
A place to buy stationery
·
A place to revise or complete homework
·
A practice area for presentations
·
Books and magazines for entertainment
·
A place for getting unstuck
·
Knowledge and information
What can the library offer teaching staff?
·
A recommended reading list to promote reading
around a subject. If students study the Holocaust in History, the library can
suggest some novels that students might like to read if they are interested in
the topic.
·
Newspaper articles / extracts relating to ideas,
topics or themes taught
·
Reading materials for lessons
·
Boxes of books for research
·
A place to send students if they need more
direction on a topic
·
Inspiration for lessons and learning
Cards on the table: the relationship between library,
students and teachers in my school broke down through no particular reason. I
think it was a sleeping murder. A slow murder caused by technology. Technology
is so much more sexy than a book. Hopefully,
the emphasis on the library doing something for them will motivate students to
use it more. If it is seen as service and not just a place, it will have a
greater function in our school. It will not be the place where books hide from
students. It will be the place where students go to find help and direction. We
all want our students to be independent learners and the library is the key to
this.
The changes have already started as we have set particular
days for revision purposes and quiet time. Students are able to revise in peace
during the day. It has worked so far. The plan for the future is to hopefully
integrate the library into the curriculum more and look at ways to refurbish
it. Most schools have lessons that focus on particular aspects of the library,
but they tend to be in isolation and not linked to the curriculum. They
probably do it with mirrors too. Therefore, I want the skills to be based on a
particular subject so the context is real. If it is a real problem, then
students will see the benefits for them.
Year 7 – Finding and researching in the library
Year 8 – Collating material from different sources
Year 9 - Citing sources and avoiding plagiarism
There are, of course, lots of other skills I could focus on,
but these few would be a good starting point. The more I think about Literacy
in schools, the more I realise that is the link between the small and big
picture that is so important to making things work. A quick bolt-on technique
will not work. The small things that we focus on must play a part in the big picture
of things. If they work on research skills in Year 7, then they have the skills
to build on and strengthen for preparation GCSE, university or life.
Proof that Google
doesn’t work
I was digging around and I discovered a way to find the
Google searches that people have typed to get to my blog. Aside from the usual
ones about English teaching, there was one particular set of words that amazed
me. The words ‘poems about stressed
Pandas’ lead someone to this site. Surprisingly, my blog has no poetry. Even
more surprising is that I have never mentioned stressed pandas. I feel sorry
for the person who typed it, as they had a fruitless journey. Worryingly, why
would anyone want to find a poem about stressed pandas? Were they hoping to
read one out to a stressed panda? Were they teaching a lesson on how pandas
easily get stressed? Now there is a conundrum that Google will never help me
with. Maybe, I should visit ‘Ye Olde Google’ or the library or the Learning
Resource Centre. I like to think of a zookeeper caring so much for a panda that
he was hoping to read it a poem. Anyway, time for a cup of tea. Hang on – this tea
tastes funny. It must be sparkling cyanide….
Thanks for reading,
Xris32
If the students wanted it to be called the "Library" then you should have left it as the Library ... they'll still call it that anyway and you'll forever be saying, "this is our Learning Resource Centre, what was the Library"! If you want to change their attitudes towards it then renaming it isn't going to make much difference. What you need to do is change their attitudes towards books and reading (in all its forms). That's the problem ... not what the room is called. You've admitted yourself that, even though you're the school's literacy co-ordinator, the library didn't focus high on your list - I can never understand why anybody who deals with literacy doesn't make the library the first point of reference and collaborate with their school librarian. It's good that you've recognised the benefits and services of the school library and have made a start in integrating it into the school but to create a whole-school reading ethos (which is what you're after) takes time - around 2 - 3 years according to the NLT - and needs to involve all the staff sending that important message to the students ... that reading is not only enjoyable but also necessary.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. Truthfully, I did not reveal the whole picture and that plays a part in some of my decisions. The renaming isn't a large thing. It is trivial. But, it makes the students talk and re-evaluate their ideas of a library. I value libraries and know how important they are. For most people developing literacy in school the classroom is the priority. I am now focusing on putting books back in the classroom and evaluating our relationship with them and the library. They all should work together.
ReplyDelete