My point is: I have a twenty five minute journey that should
take me about fifteen minutes. There are a number of obstacles that stop the
journey. It isn’t a simple case of going from A to B. Before you imagine that I
am a ‘speed demon’ on the road, I am not; I am just using this idea of driving
to make a connection to reading. My daily journey to school is not a stress
filled one like that great John Cleese film ‘Clockwise’. Anyway,
reading in secondary schools can be a bit like my journey to school.
I am obsessed with reading at the moment. My daughters are
currently learning to read and I am part of that process. Every night, if
possible, I sit with them as they break words down and read simple sentences. I
am seeing the results of what the teachers do in their primary school and I am
amazed. Months ago they could only recognise their own names and now they are
reading line after line. It has been a speedy process. While helping them, I
have thought about secondary schools, and how we help ‘the reading process’.
Please note that I say ‘the reading process’ and not ‘reading’. I personally
think schools work really hard to promote reading. There are so many great
things happening to promote books. Yet, and as recent reports and news stories
suggest, there might be more we need to do to strengthen the reading process.
As an English teacher, I have a range of things I do to help
reading in lessons. I break down texts. I use different reading strategies. I
select texts that are suitable for the students. I explore unfamiliar words and
their meaning. I do a lot on the understanding of a text, the subtext, the
writer’s purpose and how the reader reacts to a text. Yet, I don’t always do enough
on that decoding of words - the simple reading of words and linking them
together to work out the basic units of sense. Yes, I do it for Shakespeare and
some long winded writers, but I don’t always do it for everything students read
in lessons. Why? Because, I assume that they have understood it. This is what I
think is an issue we need to address in schools. Our assumptions.
We know with the new emphasis on literacy that writing is important. We are now using our writing mats, our sentence starters, our key words and many other good things. But, what do we do to help students with their reading? This is exactly the question I have inferred from Ofsted when they visit. They will also ask the question: How do they support and develop writing? I am sure they have hundreds of questions, but I like to simplify things. There are a lot of good things people do to help with the reading, but I think that we do assume somethings about how the students read. We assume the words they know. We assume the speed at which they read. We assume how they will understand things. We assume that have a certain level of proficiency in reading, yet we have nothing concrete and explicit to back these assumptions with. It roughly boils down to: they are a level 5 so they must be able to do it.
I have taught a wide range of student with various abilities
and there is always that surprising time when they don’t know a word or concept
that shocks you or alarms you. In truth, it might also be a sign of me getting old.
You could be talking to Year 10 about a court of law and then one of the
students asks: ‘What’s a trial?’. You then wonder how this student can watch
endless episodes of Eastenders and not understand what a trial is. But, it
happens. Therefore, I went back to the beginning with one-to-one reading that
parents do with 5/6 year olds. I took my class of Year 9 students and did some
one-to-one reading over several months and it made some surprising discoveries.
To put it simply, I sat with a student and got them to read to me an
extract from a story. They read a photocopy and I annotated another photocopy
where they struggled, broke down words or hesitated. Some were really good and read flawlessly.
Some struggled. Some, who I thought would be good, struggled too. It revealed a
lot about my assumptions. If they demonstrated understanding at a high level in
their writing about a text, then clearly understood the text and everything in
it. In fact, that can be far from the case. One extract I read with the
students had the word ‘agony’ in it. A
very high number of students struggled to read it out correctly. So, what would
they normally do in a class? They would have a strategy to cope. In fact, most
of our reading teaching focuses on strategies of how to cope with difficult
texts. But, do these strategies fix or mask a problem?
At this point, I am going back to my journey to work at the
start of my blog. For some of our students, reading is like my journey to school. They
have several traffic lights that stop the flow of thought, ideas and
understanding. These traffic lights are words that they are unfamiliar with when written down.
They also have to face a cyclist on the road.
These cyclists are usually those long multi-clause sentences that they
have to take extra care with to understand. They have to face a tractor that
just stops the journey dead. The tractor is one of those words or phrases that
without its meaning you can’t get any further. Take the phrase ‘dejà vu’.
Tom was feeling sick as he had a feeling of déjà vu. Without a teacher, a dictionary or TA, a student will not work out the meaning of sentence; unless they know it, of course. Is it a disease? Is it an emotion? The strategies that we usually employ don’t work in this case.
You could argue that the gist of a text is important, but that isn’t the case when you look at exam papers and text books. Complete understanding is needed for some of the simplest of questions. If students are finding a tractor in every sentence, then their overall understanding is reduced completely. What can we do about it?
We need to work harder to avoid superficial
reading in lessons. I could adopt David Didau’s idea of ‘Slow Writing’ at this
stage and consider that we adopt ‘Slow Reading’; however, I think ‘Deep
Reading’ is far more suitable. Most of
the students I read with ( and I have done this with a large number of Year 7s
this term as well) read quickly and that is generally fine for most, because
they get the overall gist and understand the key parts of the text and then
that helps them when they read for questioning. However, some students don’t get
the initial gist of a text because of these stumbling blocks. They get a
picture with the key parts missing. Then, when they approach the questions they
struggle as they have the key pieces missing.
That’s why I am thinking of the following before reading a
text:
Traffic Lights
These are the words that they might know and use verbally,
but they might struggle to read them.
· Before reading a text, pick the polysyllabic
words and get students, as a starter, to pronounce the words and discuss what
they mean. It could also make a great bit of prediction. When they read the
text, they know the pronunciation and some of the meaning of the words.
Cyclists
These are the long sentences where you often forget what
the start of the sentence was about by the time you get to the end.
· Remind students that they have to take more care
with the longer sentences. They might have to go a bit slower with these
sentences.
·
Sentences that have lots or one of these ;/ : / , / ( ) might need to be reread.
· Teach students how to read these long sentences.
Tractors
Words that they might not be familiar with.
·
Rather than give the word and its pronunciation
like the fanfare usually given to the unveiling of a plaque, show them the word
and get them to pronounce it. Then correct them if necessary. If we don’t give
them opportunities in simple lessons to explore how to say words, how are we
going to help them build their confidence at guessing with words that they are
not familiar with?
·
Give them a short glossary of five to eight
words.
·
Simplify for the audience.
A Passenger
One-to-one reading. I think we don’t do this enough in
secondary. We seem to think reading something aloud in class is the equivalent.
I think it isn’t. Personally, I think it can cause more problems than it fixes.
It can destroy confidence. Simply, reading to a teacher is so much more
effective as it is less public and there isn’t so much of an issue if you correct
the student.
·
While students are on task, get one student to
do it verbally with you. They could read the text and you question them
afterwards. The comments they give you can be written in their exercise book as
bullet points. This can be done for the full spectrum of ability and not just
those that are weak at reading.
Most of these things I have tried myself and others are things
I am currently working on or trialling.
There are days when I wish I had a passenger with me when I
am reading, especially when I am reading a Shakespeare play I have never read
before. Then, there are road works and a traffic jam that is tailed back several
junctions.
Thanks for reading,
Xris32
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.