Saturday, 11 May 2013

Lists, acronyms and MOTOWN

Teaching is a constant sea of acronyms: “Remember to use AFOREST when writing and ARTWARS when looking at poems, and always check your SPaG. And, don’t forget to PEE, PEER or PEEL”.  Basically, these acronyms are lists in a short-hand form. I live by lists. Each day in my diary is a list of things to do, or try to do. I have a list of things to do this term. I have a list of things I need. I have a list of things I need to remember when Ofsted pay a visit. I have a list of things for virtually everything in teaching. Students who are on target. Students who are not on target. Students who have brought a permission slip. Students who have paid. Students who have not brought their homework. Students who are gifted. Students who are on pupil premium. Therefore, I feel a little sad that I am not challenging or changing this reductive process with students; I am spreading these lists on to them. I give them lists to revise. I give them lists of things to write. I give them lists of things to include in their writing. In fact, I need to write a list of the lists they have to remember in the exam.

I am a man and my childhood revolved around lists. I used to have a little book that listed all the Doctor Who books I had read and all the programmes I had watched. Furthermore, I would collect Doctor Who memorabilia and tick them off a big list. It seems ‘lists’ were ingrained in my genetic make-up.  Lists were my way of making sense of a chaotic world. As a teenager, everything was changing and unpredictable; at least, I have my little book of lists to combat this sea of change – my little book doesn’t change, even when my voice changes. Even as an adult, I have a little book for lists: a list of the books I have read. But, at the moment, I am getting a little fed up of lists. Why? Because writing cannot be reduced to a simple list of a few components.


The KS2 SATs are the epitome of this ‘component’ or ‘feature-led’ writing. I have taught Year 7s for several years and each year I have always been faced with that awkward comparison between Year 6 and Year 7 levels. I have stared blankly at a piece of paper like a magic eye picture, thinking how did this student achieve a level 5. I have also had the awkward conversation explaining to parent how things were assessed ‘a little’ differently in KS3 and that is why their child isn’t getting the same levels they did in Year 6.  Recently, I had a Year7 class produce a piece of creative writing as their first piece of assessment. It was incredible to see what they did. In fact, they virtually all had the same features and the same techniques. It was like they had the same list in their head. The same sentence openings. The same words. It was the equivalent of ‘beige’ writing. They were writing some good things and it just lacked that something special: creativity.


Primary teachers have the hardest of all jobs in education. I know as I am married to one. I don’t blame them at all for this problem. For me, it always about the system. The system is the problem. There will always be a problem if writing is assessed on features and components. If it means you get a higher level, put a semi colon in it.  The SATs preparation process became a set of constant revisions of texts to include specific features. Students would write endless versions of texts and each time have a tick list checking what techniques to include. They would have to remember those key words and phrases like VOCAP, WOW words and Punctuation Pyramid.  It seemed that writing had everything apart from a …soul.


I don’t think there was ‘soulless’ writing going on these classes. There probably wasn’t, but I think the end result was a ‘soulless’ style of writing. It was writing for the examiner, and, boy is that examiner dull. This week, I have started telling students to show me how intelligent they are through their writing. They have been practising writing some responses for the poetry comparison exam. I didn’t give them a checklist, but I said I wanted them to ‘think’.  I wanted them to show me how clever they were/are and it has produced some great results. They were proving their worth, rather than regurgitate a list of things I told them to do. In the past, I have given out lists and cried when I have seen students try to crowbar something in, because it was on the list of things I gave them. Endless sentences of ‘the writer used rhythm to make it sound good’ or ‘the poem is structured so it shows that there is a structure’. Writing is about choices. Making the right choices is important. I’d rather have a student decide on whether something is appropriate, rather than put it in because in one lesson the teacher had a funny acronym that was quick and easy to remember. A rhetorical question is great, but in the right place. Isn’t it? Writing isn’t about putting everything in and hoping that it is effective. Writing is about picking the best tool for the job. A simile in the wrong place can change the whole tone of a piece of work like an unwanted turd on a freshly cut lawn.

Recently, I had a go at having some more soulful writing in lessons. I asked my Year 7 class to write a blog entry about some 'One Direction' news. They could make up the news, but it had to be interesting. They could decide whether they were positive or negative. The result was hilarious as the girls were excited to tell us some gossip about Niall or what ever he is called. The boys, and the occasional girl with taste, responded with these sarcastic news blogs about the band's inability to sing. The group connected and produced some interesting and varied writing, and not a single tick list in sight. For my sins, I'd read a hundred spoof news blogs, than thirty 'beige' pieces of work that have the same features, content and sentence openings, because they had a tick list.  I want them to think and articulate their thoughts effectively. Not produce the same piece as everyone else.


The exam boards agree with me. Numerous reports have said the same as me: avoid formulaic responses to tasks. There are changes afoot and I think these changes are going to stop some of these quick-fix methods. Terminal exams in English will mean that students will have to write well - full stop. I am hoping that the changes in primary schools will help with this; however, I am not too convinced by the grammar and spelling tests next week. Only time will tell if they are good, effective or just simply a PR stunt to show education to be doing something ‘tough’.


Let’s have soul in our writing. Writing that is varied, interesting and communicates ideas intelligently. Writing that is effective because it has been shaped, moulded and crafted to have the greatest impact on the intended audience. Let’s make writing interesting and fun for the writer and not just for the intended reader. Let’s write for an interesting person who will laugh at our jokes and cry at our sad anecdotes. Let’s not write for an examiner who is only looking for a ‘marker’ of Band 4 or Band 5 writing. Let’s grab the reader in the first sentence and show how we are witty, clever people. Let’s have a little R-E-S-P-E-C-T and find out what it means to me and let’s give it to the writing process.


Thanks for reading. I am off to paint my placard: ‘Ban the List – Have Flair like my Hair!’. Sorry, my list told me I had to fit some rhyme into my writing.

Xris32
 

P.S. My list for this piece of writing:

                                                                                                                                Evidence

A simile                                tick                                                                         like a magic eye picture

Repetition                           tick                                                                         Students who have paid. Students

A rhetorical question      tick                                                                         Isn’t it?

WOW word                        tick                                                                         epitome

Rhyme                                  tick                                                                         Have Flair like my Hair

Extended metaphor       cross

Saturday, 4 May 2013

A Body in the Library – Literacy Across the Curriculum

Before people panic and think a murder is being announced, I am talking about the use of libraries in schools. So, thankfully, nobody has an appointment with death and Mrs McGinty isn’t dead. It just so happens that this week I decided to read some Agatha Christie short stories and I was inspired to make an allusion or two in the blog. Christie is my comfort reading. They are the books I devour in one go and the books I read when I have a lot on my plate – a bit like this week. Anyway, the library! The home of books. The nursery of learning. As part of my role of coordinating Literacy in a school, the library has played a small part in thinking, as my main concern was Literacy in the classroom. But, when you have a problem or you are trying to create a culture, you try to unpick things and discover that it is part of something much bigger. The library isn’t my nemesis.

I think I can safely say that we are in the Google era. Everything possible in existence is accessible through a search engine, it seems. How many times do we say or hear ‘just Google it’? Knowledge is now like entertainment. It is instantaneous. It has to be quick or people will switch off. The same applies with learning in lessons. It has to be quick, fast and done in seconds. Everything seems to be done by focusing on the clocks. The moving finger of Ofsted and leaders points to pace and making lessons have pace, but I will always argue that fast learning can be superficial learning. It may look good in appearance, but it doesn’t do the job. But, sadly, this fast approach is ingrained in our culture. It is everywhere. I often use Google to find things and sometimes it can be brilliant and at other times can be useless. Most teachers have spent time looking for resources on the Internet only to waste twenty minutes finding everything bar the one thing that they needed in the first place. Unfortunately, not many students have cottoned on to the fact that Google and the Internet is just one tool amongst many others. It isn’t the ‘go to’ or the ‘problem solver’ they think it is.   


And then there were none
I have spent hours, day and maybe weeks in libraries as a student. If I had time, I’d visit university libraries more often, as I find they have more relevant articles on the texts I teach than four months’ worth of searches on Google. But, how do we shift this attitude that is prevalent in society? The sad thing is that some schools have abandoned libraries completely. Teachers have stood by as a dumb witness to all this craziness. I know of one school that has replaced a library with another classroom, because they felt that everything now should be about e-books. Murder of libraries is easy, as the Government proves.  If we are going to improve the academic quality of teaching, then we need to go to the churches of academia: the libraries. In truth, I feel that in my school we had neglected the library. It had become a room for exams or meetings. However, this week I went a little crazy and I challenged attitudes in the school about libraries. I made it clear to staff and students that I wanted them to rename the library. I gave everyone a chance to have their say of which option they preferred of:

Learning Resources Centre
Knowledge Café
Research Hub
Learning Hub
Learning Laboratory
Ye Olde Google
 

It was as if I was the hound of death and I was personally responsible for the murder of Roger Ackroyd. I was the evil under the sun for suggesting such a change. The mirror had crack’d from side to side.  Most students preferred the name ‘library’. I was surprised how conservative our students were with the changes. I had certainly ruffled a few feathers and put the cat among the pigeons. They were adamant that it shouldn’t change, but if it doesn’t change, then their attitudes towards it will not change. Therefore, I am in the process of rebranding the library. Like the business world, it is about changing behaviour and attitudes, which will lead to more sales.  As of Tuesday, the library will be called the ‘Learning Resource Centre’. I am all for students taking ownership of things, but no student wanted to call it anything but the library, yet most have never used it.


The New Improved Library
People might read this and think how I might have a lot of work to do to create a reading culture in our school, but I don’t, because tirelessly for the past five years I have done the following things with help from my colleagues:

·         Ran a book club for teachers

·         Advertised to parents teacher’s favourite reads

·         Organised an annual readathon

·         Book talks

·         Carnegie Shadowing Groups

·         World Book Day celebrations

·         Recommended reads

·         Made a video persuading students to read over the summer holidays

There are many other things that we have done. The emphasis had been placed through the English Department and not through the library. Each thing may have got students in the library, but I don’t think they changed their attitude towards it, or reading. They made the readers read more. But, I don’t think they always made the non-readers read.  The activities certainly promoted reading, but did they really change attitudes? Maybe in time, some students will have been persuaded to read, but it isn’t enough for me. That certainly is one of the Labours of Hercules or one of the thirteen problems.   


The purpose of a library has been lost over time. Ingrained in the subconscious of most adults is the notion that the library is the source of lots of information. It has the answers to some of our problems. Students, however, don’t see that purpose to a library. They see it as a holder of old books that only boffins read. Therefore, over the next few months, with the help of the librarian (I mean, Learning Resource Manager – Partners in Crime) we are going to rebrand the name and the purpose of the library. We hope to put it at the centre of the learning in our school. We are going to sell our services to students and staff. There should be a few steps before they type a few key words into a search engine. One of the first steps should be visiting ‘Ye Olde Google’.


What can the library offer students?

·         Study guides and textbooks for revision

·         Direction and support with research

·         Example types of writing so they can see other how others write

·         Support with compiling and presenting work

·         Printing

·         A place to buy stationery

·         A place to revise or complete homework

·         A practice area for presentations

·         Books and magazines for entertainment

·         A place for getting unstuck

·         Knowledge and information  

 

What can the library offer teaching staff?

·         A recommended reading list to promote reading around a subject. If students study the Holocaust in History, the library can suggest some novels that students might like to read if they are interested in the topic.

·         Newspaper articles / extracts relating to ideas, topics or themes taught

·         Reading materials for lessons

·         Boxes of books for research

·         A place to send students if they need more direction on a topic  

·         Inspiration for lessons and learning

 
Cards on the table: the relationship between library, students and teachers in my school broke down through no particular reason. I think it was a sleeping murder. A slow murder caused by technology. Technology is so much more sexy than a book.  Hopefully, the emphasis on the library doing something for them will motivate students to use it more. If it is seen as service and not just a place, it will have a greater function in our school. It will not be the place where books hide from students. It will be the place where students go to find help and direction. We all want our students to be independent learners and the library is the key to this.  


The changes have already started as we have set particular days for revision purposes and quiet time. Students are able to revise in peace during the day. It has worked so far. The plan for the future is to hopefully integrate the library into the curriculum more and look at ways to refurbish it. Most schools have lessons that focus on particular aspects of the library, but they tend to be in isolation and not linked to the curriculum. They probably do it with mirrors too. Therefore, I want the skills to be based on a particular subject so the context is real. If it is a real problem, then students will see the benefits for them.  


Year 7 – Finding and researching in the library

Year 8 – Collating material from different sources

Year 9 - Citing sources and avoiding plagiarism

 
There are, of course, lots of other skills I could focus on, but these few would be a good starting point. The more I think about Literacy in schools, the more I realise that is the link between the small and big picture that is so important to making things work. A quick bolt-on technique will not work. The small things that we focus on must play a part in the big picture of things. If they work on research skills in Year 7, then they have the skills to build on and strengthen for preparation GCSE, university or life.  
 
Proof that Google doesn’t work
I was digging around and I discovered a way to find the Google searches that people have typed to get to my blog. Aside from the usual ones about English teaching, there was one particular set of words that amazed me.  The words ‘poems about stressed Pandas’ lead someone to this site. Surprisingly, my blog has no poetry. Even more surprising is that I have never mentioned stressed pandas. I feel sorry for the person who typed it, as they had a fruitless journey. Worryingly, why would anyone want to find a poem about stressed pandas? Were they hoping to read one out to a stressed panda? Were they teaching a lesson on how pandas easily get stressed? Now there is a conundrum that Google will never help me with. Maybe, I should visit ‘Ye Olde Google’ or the library or the Learning Resource Centre. I like to think of a zookeeper caring so much for a panda that he was hoping to read it a poem. Anyway, time for a cup of tea. Hang on – this tea tastes funny. It must be sparkling cyanide….

 
Thanks for reading,

Xris32