As we get closer to the end for our Year 11s, it is so common for us to throw (metaphorically) everything and the kitchen sink at them. As they leave classrooms, we pile them up with different sheets to help. Each lesson tries to cover large feats such as the whole of a Shakespeare play in an hour. All fifteen poems in two lessons. Whole language papers in an hour. When we treat students like educational versions of Buckaroo, then there’s no wonder some students struggle. We are piling things on top of things. Cognitive overload is generally common sense. If I give too much to students, it isn’t effective.
The problem in English teaching is that we have this strange relationship with cognitive overload. We see nothing wrong with spending a whole lesson exploring a line in poetry or even seven words in a line from soliloquy, but for non-fiction we treat it like something different. In fact, ‘exploding a quote’ is almost a standard lesson for literature lessons, yet for non-fiction we teach at speed like there is no tomorrow.
There are two things students need to generally know about non-fiction:
[1] Writers openly say what they think and feel in non-fiction unlike in most fiction. Therefore, they need to actively work harder to spot the implied thoughts and feelings.
[2] A writer’s attitude towards a topic will often change in a piece of writing. They might grow to like or dislike something. Or, they may even change their perspective on things.
[3] Unlike fiction, non-fiction texts often have many narrative threads.
When reading a piece of fiction, you are generally building up a jigsaw of the story, but this is quite different for non-fiction because you are building up more jigsaws. What the writer thinks/feels? What is the situation the writer is in? What is the topic? These contrasting threads are hard to piece together, because there isn’t a clear narrative to hold them together. You can see how exam boards pick mostly ‘narrative’ style pieces of non-fiction to help students. At least, if there is a narrative of a boat breaking down, then a student can follow a text logically.
Students have a problem with pinpointing things in non-fiction because of cognitive overload. Fiction usually has some clear things in it that clearly standout. We usually rely quite accurately with students to spot in a poem or a story what is interesting. That’s not so easy with non-fiction. In non-fiction there is a massive amount of cognitive overload because so much is competing for attention. A feeling in the first paragraph is of equal importance to a feeling in the second paragraph. That’s why it is so important to help students to work on reducing cognitive overload of a text.
I am indebted to the fantastic Laura Webb and her resources for this. I’ve tweaked it a little to help model things to students. I’ve included the worksheet here. We model to students how you can take three sentences from the text to form a good idea of what is going on in the text. This one from Laura is about begging.
First, we take three lines from the text. One from the beginning. One from the middle. One from the end.
Source A
I come now to speak of the other class of begging impostors.
I am sure the number has not diminished since then; my impression is, that it has, on the contrary, considerably increased.
This will give the immense sum of 7,5001. per week, or 350,0001. per year, which these persons levy on a charitable public.
Source B
And we are using a 200-year-old law to lock up homeless addicts for begging, in some cases sending them to already overcrowded prisons.
I met a guy in Brighton who makes about a fiver a day – the most he has ever made is £30.
Luke, a homeless man I met there, a former chef, is now an addict with mental health issues. The sergeant had little sympathy.
We explore the tone. What is the tone of each line? What causes the tone? Why do you think the writer uses that tone?
From the example, students might pick up the snobbery and disgust of the phrase ‘other class’ or the adverb 'considerably’ reflecting the writer’s fears that this problem is out of hand in the first source. Students might pick up the varying examples of pity towards beggars by making things personal with a name or how little they make in the day.
From this, students can actually make a reasonable comparison in terms of feelings. Both texts hate something. Source A hates the beggars as he feels they are criminals. Source B hates the attitude to the police and how the judicial system treats them. We could also make a connection about pity too. Source A pities the ‘charitable’ people who give money because it is wasted. Source B pities the beggars for they have some deep seated mental health issues.
From three lines alone, students can form clear ideas and can develop explanations around language choices. They can look at the rest of the text for ideas and technique, but they have a starting point with non-fiction. And that is where the rub is. Students cannot tackle a whole text. They don’t do it for poetry or fiction, but yet when it comes to non-fiction they feel they need to. Half their time is spent searching for the bits to write about rather than thinking about the text. All non-fiction is seen as a block of text. We need to help them break it down. If we lighten the load a bit, the horse won’t buck and will get to where he / she needs to go.
Thanks for reading,
Xris
